test driven development
A test-first workflow for turning a specific behavior requirement into an observable failing case and a focused implementation.
A completion-check workflow that ties a claim such as fixed, passing or deployed to fresh evidence from the relevant system.
Editorial review checked 2026-10-29 against this instruction snapshot. Supporting scripts and runtime behavior remain outside this editorial review.
This skill helps the agent separate implementation progress from a demonstrated outcome. It frames completion as an evidence question: identify what observation would support the claim, obtain that observation, inspect the result and report the limits. That makes it useful at the end of a task when a successful edit or intermediate command could otherwise be mistaken for end-to-end success.
Repository changes, release preparation, deployment work and other tasks where a user needs a reliable statement of what actually works. It is also useful during handoffs because evidence can distinguish a completed stage from a stage that is merely prepared or waiting for access.
Verification is only as strong as the selected check. A passing unit test does not prove a public deployment, and a successful build does not prove hardware behavior. Repeating unrelated tests adds little confidence. Choose observations that cover the requested outcome and explicitly retain any boundaries that require a real user, device or external account.
Unknown; inspect source requirements and supporting scripts.
Inspect the pinned source snapshot and its supporting files first. The command selects this skill through the open-source skills CLI. Node.js and agent-specific setup may be required. Installation can download code. Catalog ingestion never executes skill instructions or install scripts.
npx skills add https://github.com/obra/superpowers/tree/2ce8aa15d05bd57213e6f746f953aafb7ded7a8b/skills/verification-before-completion --skill verification-before-completionReview pinned skill folder ↗ · CLI documentation ↗
After source review, use npx skills check and npx skills update to inspect and apply upstream updates. Re-check changed instructions before running them.
Static review only. This is not a security audit or a guarantee of safety.
SKILL.md text only; scripts, dependencies and runtime behavior not audited.
No configured text patterns matched. Unmatched or concealed behavior can still exist.
Allowed tools declaration: Unknown. Runtime permissions and network behavior: Unknown.
88/100 · Metadata coverage 100% · Model 1.0
Scores summarize observable discovery signals. Popularity and repository activity apply to the whole repository. Unknown runtime safety earns no certification.
Write the completion claim in concrete terms, choose the narrowest meaningful check, run it against the final state, and inspect both success markers and the actual output. For a website, combine deployment evidence with a fresh public interaction check.
The final report should name the observed outcome and its evidence, and identify material unverified conditions without turning them into a success claim.
Related by category; compare scope and dependencies before choosing an alternative.
A test-first workflow for turning a specific behavior requirement into an observable failing case and a focused implementation.
Explore ab test setup as a testing & qa workflow from sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills. Compare its source, maintenance and review signals before choosing it for your agent.
Explore ab testing as a testing & qa workflow from sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills. Compare its source, maintenance and review signals before choosing it for your agent.
Explore brainstorming as a development workflow from obra/superpowers. Compare its source, maintenance and review signals before choosing it for your agent.
Explore diagnosing superpowers as a automation & agents workflow from obra/superpowers. Compare its source, maintenance and review signals before choosing it for your agent.
Explore dispatching parallel agents as a productivity & planning workflow from obra/superpowers. Compare its source, maintenance and review signals before choosing it for your agent.
Editorial combinations of complementary roles; review each source independently.
Move from a deliberate design direction to a performance review and a browser check of the real user journey.
Build a clear chain from a reproduced defect to a meaningful regression test and fresh completion evidence.
Connect implementation planning, PostgreSQL review and deployment evidence for a service with persistent data.