Skip to skills
AI Craft Pad
Home/Skills/Testing & QA/verification-before-completion
Community source

Verification Before Completion

A completion-check workflow that ties a claim such as fixed, passing or deployed to fresh evidence from the relevant system.

Editorial review checked 2026-10-29 against this instruction snapshot. Supporting scripts and runtime behavior remain outside this editorial review.

What it does

This skill helps the agent separate implementation progress from a demonstrated outcome. It frames completion as an evidence question: identify what observation would support the claim, obtain that observation, inspect the result and report the limits. That makes it useful at the end of a task when a successful edit or intermediate command could otherwise be mistaken for end-to-end success.

Best for

Repository changes, release preparation, deployment work and other tasks where a user needs a reliable statement of what actually works. It is also useful during handoffs because evidence can distinguish a completed stage from a stage that is merely prepared or waiting for access.

Tradeoffs and requirements

Verification is only as strong as the selected check. A passing unit test does not prove a public deployment, and a successful build does not prove hardware behavior. Repeating unrelated tests adds little confidence. Choose observations that cover the requested outcome and explicitly retain any boundaries that require a real user, device or external account.

Unknown; inspect source requirements and supporting scripts.

Install from the source

Inspect the pinned source snapshot and its supporting files first. The command selects this skill through the open-source skills CLI. Node.js and agent-specific setup may be required. Installation can download code. Catalog ingestion never executes skill instructions or install scripts.

npx skills add https://github.com/obra/superpowers/tree/2ce8aa15d05bd57213e6f746f953aafb7ded7a8b/skills/verification-before-completion --skill verification-before-completion

Review pinned skill folder ↗ · CLI documentation ↗

After source review, use npx skills check and npx skills update to inspect and apply upstream updates. Re-check changed instructions before running them.

Safety & review signals

Static review only. This is not a security audit or a guarantee of safety.

SKILL.md text only; scripts, dependencies and runtime behavior not audited.

No configured text patterns matched. Unmatched or concealed behavior can still exist.

Allowed tools declaration: Unknown. Runtime permissions and network behavior: Unknown.

AI Craft Pad Skill Score

88/100 · Metadata coverage 100% · Model 1.0

Scores summarize observable discovery signals. Popularity and repository activity apply to the whole repository. Unknown runtime safety earns no certification.

Documentation
100/100
100
Maintenance
100/100
100
License Clarity
100/100
100
Repository Health
100/100
100
Compatibility Evidence
80/100
80
Popularity
99/100
99
Originality
80/100
80
Static Safety
60/100
60
Read the formula and limits →

Suggested workflow

Write the completion claim in concrete terms, choose the narrowest meaningful check, run it against the final state, and inspect both success markers and the actual output. For a website, combine deployment evidence with a fresh public interaction check.

How to judge the result

The final report should name the observed outcome and its evidence, and identify material unverified conditions without turning them into a success claim.

Similar skills to compare

Related by category; compare scope and dependencies before choosing an alternative.

Testing & QA88/100

test driven development

obra/superpowers

A test-first workflow for turning a specific behavior requirement into an observable failing case and a focused implementation.

Community sourceMITEditorial review
308,765 repo stars1 text flagReview ↗
Testing & QA87/100

ab test setup

sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills

Explore ab test setup as a testing & qa workflow from sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills. Compare its source, maintenance and review signals before choosing it for your agent.

Community sourceMIT6 matching source records
48,763 repo stars1 text flagReview ↗
Testing & QA87/100

ab testing

sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills

Explore ab testing as a testing & qa workflow from sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills. Compare its source, maintenance and review signals before choosing it for your agent.

Community sourceMIT3 matching source records
48,763 repo stars2 text flagsReview ↗

More from this source

Development88/100

brainstorming

obra/superpowers

Explore brainstorming as a development workflow from obra/superpowers. Compare its source, maintenance and review signals before choosing it for your agent.

Community sourceMIT
308,765 repo stars0 text flagsReview ↗
Automation & agents88/100

diagnosing superpowers

obra/superpowers

Explore diagnosing superpowers as a automation & agents workflow from obra/superpowers. Compare its source, maintenance and review signals before choosing it for your agent.

Community sourceMIT
308,765 repo stars0 text flagsReview ↗
Productivity & planning88/100

dispatching parallel agents

obra/superpowers

Explore dispatching parallel agents as a productivity & planning workflow from obra/superpowers. Compare its source, maintenance and review signals before choosing it for your agent.

Community sourceMIT
308,765 repo stars0 text flagsReview ↗

Works well in these suggested workflows

Editorial combinations of complementary roles; review each source independently.