A reviewer-facing PR writing workflow that explains the final behavioral change and its evidence.
Editorial review checked 2026-10-29 against this instruction snapshot. Supporting scripts and runtime behavior remain outside this editorial review.
The source starts with the complete branch diff and current PR state. It scales the description to the change, using additional risk, migration or validation detail only when a reviewer needs it. When scope evolves, it favors rewriting around the final implementation rather than narrating abandoned approaches.
Developers preparing a new pull request or refreshing an existing description after substantial implementation changes.
The title types and workflow conventions are Sentry-specific. The skill can help with communication but cannot infer tests that were never run or establish approval to publish. Existing repository templates and disclosure boundaries still need consideration.
Unknown; inspect source requirements and supporting scripts.
Inspect the pinned source snapshot and its supporting files first. The command selects this skill through the open-source skills CLI. Node.js and agent-specific setup may be required. Installation can download code. Catalog ingestion never executes skill instructions or install scripts.
npx skills add https://github.com/getsentry/skills/tree/d12f250460ffd961f549dbebf7eeb0cf4afd4c2e/skills/pr-writer --skill pr-writerReview pinned skill folder ↗ · CLI documentation ↗
After source review, use npx skills check and npx skills update to inspect and apply upstream updates. Re-check changed instructions before running them.
Static review only. This is not a security audit or a guarantee of safety.
SKILL.md text only; scripts, dependencies and runtime behavior not audited.
Allowed tools declaration: Unknown. Runtime permissions and network behavior: Unknown.
86/100 · Metadata coverage 100% · Model 1.0
Scores summarize observable discovery signals. Popularity and repository activity apply to the whole repository. Unknown runtime safety earns no certification.
Identify the concrete problem, changed behavior and affected users from the diff. Draft the smallest complete explanation, then add evidence and remaining limitations that materially affect review.
Compare every claim against the final files and actual validation output. Ensure the title matches the full scope, references point to the right artifacts, and the description does not include credentials, private conversations or unsupported readiness claims.
Related by category; compare scope and dependencies before choosing an alternative.
An implementation-planning workflow for translating a multi-step requirement into small changes with clear interfaces and verification steps.
Repository star change: +1264 over 41.38 hours. 2026-10-31
Explore writing skills as a writing & documents workflow from obra/superpowers. Compare its source, maintenance and review signals before choosing it for your agent.
Repository star change: +1264 over 41.38 hours. 2026-10-31
Explore 2slides ppt generator as a writing & documents workflow from sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills. Compare its source, maintenance and review signals before choosing it for your agent.
Repository star change: +147 over 41.38 hours. 2026-10-31
A concise repository-instruction workflow that derives agent guidance from files and commands that actually exist.
Repository star change: +5 over 41.38 hours. 2026-10-31
Explore blog writing guide as a writing & documents workflow from getsentry/skills. Compare its source, maintenance and review signals before choosing it for your agent.
Repository star change: +5 over 41.38 hours. 2026-10-31
Explore brand guidelines as a writing & documents workflow from getsentry/skills. Compare its source, maintenance and review signals before choosing it for your agent.
Repository star change: +5 over 41.38 hours. 2026-10-31